The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
نویسندگان
چکیده
The accurate recognition of individuals is a cornerstone of social exchange in primates. Current approaches to the study of individual recognition, however, are focused on human performance and only occasionally reference comparative research for support. A number of studies have suggested that humans can easily recognize thousands of individual faces and that this perceptual expertise is supported by holistic processing, a phenomenon best demonstrated by the composite face effect (CFE). Recent advances have indicated that the CFE in humans is robust to changes in contrast polarity (positive or negative). Here we apply a two alternative forced choice match-to-sample paradigm across two species of nonhuman primate, chimpanzees (Pan troglodyte) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). We find strong evidence that chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys experience interference from holistic processing in the positive contrast condition. While there is some indication that the chimpanzees experienced a CFE in the negative contrast condition, there was no evidence of a CFE in the corresponding rhesus monkey data. These results suggest that, while holistic processing is a general mechanism, rhesus monkeys are more sensitive to contrast-polarity than humans.
منابع مشابه
Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Faces are one of the most salient classes of stimuli involved in social communication. Three experiments compared face-recognition abilities in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). In the face-matching task, the chimpanzees matched identical photographs of conspecifics' faces on Trial 1, and the rhesus monkeys did the same after 4 generalization trials. In the indi...
متن کاملJournal of Comparative Psychology Personality Structure in Brown Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus apella): Comparisons With Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Orangutans (Pongo spp.), and Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)
Personality Structure in Brown Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus apella): Comparisons With Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Orangutans (Pongo spp.), and Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) F. Blake Morton, Phyllis C. Lee, Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith, Sarah F. Brosnan, Bernard Thierry, Annika Paukner, Frans B. M. de Waal, Jane Widness, Jennifer L. Essler, and Alexander Weiss Online First Publication, May 13, 20...
متن کاملThe importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
Understanding how individual identity is processed from faces remains a complex problem. Contrast reversal, showing faces in photographic negative, impairs face recognition in humans and demonstrates the importance of surface-based information (shading and pigmentation) in face recognition. We tested the importance of contrast information for face encoding in chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys usin...
متن کاملEvolutionary and Biomedical Insights from the Rhesus Macaque Genome
The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) is an abundant primate species that diverged from the ancestors of Homo sapiens about 25 million years ago. Because they are genetically and physiologically similar to humans, rhesus monkeys are the most widely used nonhuman primate in basic and applied biomedical research. We determined the genome sequence of an Indian-origin Macaca mulatta female and compar...
متن کاملEvolutionary and Biomedical Insights from the Rhesus Macaque Genome
The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) is an abundant primate species that diverged from the ancestors of Homo sapiens about 25 million years ago. Because they are genetically and physiologically similar to humans, rhesus monkeys are the most widely used nonhuman primate in basic and applied biomedical research. We determined the genome sequence of an Indian-origin Macaca mulatta female and compar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of comparative psychology
دوره 126 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012